<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hogwash to Greenwash</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techforecasters.com/weblog/archives/hogwash-to-greenwash/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techforecasters.com/weblog/archives/hogwash-to-greenwash/</link>
	<description>Read what our thought leaders are thinking, in our every-other-Friday TFI blog entries.   Sign up with your favorite RSS Feed service and get an automated alert whenever there&#039;s a new posting to the TFI Weblog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 16:09:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Technology Forecasters, Inc. &#124; Global Consulting and Research for Outsourcing and the Environment</title>
		<link>http://www.techforecasters.com/weblog/archives/hogwash-to-greenwash/comment-page-1/#comment-860</link>
		<dc:creator>Technology Forecasters, Inc. &#124; Global Consulting and Research for Outsourcing and the Environment</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 16:54:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techforecasters.com/weblog/archives/hogwash-to-greenwash/#comment-860</guid>
		<description>[...] The issue of offsets was brought to my attention by Saxton Rose, the creative director of TFI’s Web site, after he had read my blog on green wash several weeks ago. Voluntary carbon offsets do have the potential to become another form of green wash with more PR benefit to the adopting company than any real impact on the environment. I would not excessively praise companies that adopt voluntary offsets, especially if that is the sum of their green efforts. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The issue of offsets was brought to my attention by Saxton Rose, the creative director of TFI’s Web site, after he had read my blog on green wash several weeks ago. Voluntary carbon offsets do have the potential to become another form of green wash with more PR benefit to the adopting company than any real impact on the environment. I would not excessively praise companies that adopt voluntary offsets, especially if that is the sum of their green efforts. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.techforecasters.com/weblog/archives/hogwash-to-greenwash/comment-page-1/#comment-310</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Feb 2007 12:32:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techforecasters.com/weblog/archives/hogwash-to-greenwash/#comment-310</guid>
		<description>I am with you, and have an ongoing commentary on my website.  Currently, I am in a dialog with Dyson, Andis, Black and Decker, and Patagonia.  Let me know what you think, and if you have another manufacturer you might think needs attention.

Here is one post:
http://www.greenions.com/consumer-products/household-goods/dyson-vacuums/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am with you, and have an ongoing commentary on my website.  Currently, I am in a dialog with Dyson, Andis, Black and Decker, and Patagonia.  Let me know what you think, and if you have another manufacturer you might think needs attention.</p>
<p>Here is one post:<br />
<a href="http://www.greenions.com/consumer-products/household-goods/dyson-vacuums/" rel="nofollow">http://www.greenions.com/consumer-products/household-goods/dyson-vacuums/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
