When in the mid-1990s I started researching high-tech companies’ beyond-compliance environmental accomplishments, I found a few dozen executives who cared about reducing their companies’ environmental impact and who saw competitive advantage from doing so. By the beginning of this decade, when my book Lean and Green was published, more executives had chosen a leadership path toward environmental stewardship and were already starting to reduce costs, improve brand, and meet employees at their values.

Moving forward in time to the 2008-09 global economic crisis–and specifically to last week’s Green Manufacturing Conference– I now find tech companies embracing environmental-impact reduction as a key corporate strategy to surviving and thriving in the face of slower growing or negative-growth revenues. In my keynote presentation at last week’s Southern California conference, I described corporations’ current triple headache of cost cutting, environmental compliance, and standing out positively in the market, and how creating an aggressive and inspiring beyond-compliance corporate initiative weaves together a strategic solution to all three issues.

Conference speaker Leslie Collins of HP described how an HP product is helping UPS to reduce environmental impact and save $16.9 million in labor costs, $11.8 million in projected capital costs, and $1.9 million in consumables costs by 2013. The HP Handheld sp400 All-in-One scans and prints on packages (using 2D imaging) without needing paper labels, thus avoiding the use of 1,338 tons of paper.

According to speaker David Conrad, head of environment for Nokia North America, in the past 9 years Nokia aggressively reduced the no-load consumption of its chargers by 90% (down to 0.03 watts when in a no-load status), with correlating reductions in environmental impact and customers’ electricity bills as well.

These millions of dollars savings for high-tech companies and their customers are contributing significantly to corporations’ abilities to be economically sustainable. The conference illustrated that the business benefit from lean and green strategies is both systematic (there’s nothing fuzzy about it) and systemic (yielding cost and environmental savings throughout the corporation).

In these days of necessary carbon-emissions reductions, I did not press out-of-region clients and colleagues to travel to Southern California for the Green Manufacturing Conference (even though many of them in cold climates wanted badly to attend). Conference Manager Melanie Cruz of Canon Communications and I (as conference chair) saw to it that nearly all of the speakers were from the local region or were traveling to California for other reasons. Nokia’s Conrad, based in Texas, participated in the keynote panel by teleconference to minimize his company’s carbon footprint. We design travel-reduction plans for our clients as well, leveraging more and more great alternatives to travel to achieve both lean and green benefits.

So, if you are reading this blog from Europe, come to the 25-26 March Green Mfg. Conference in Birmingham, UK. And if you sit in North America, I can advise you of closer-to-you Green Mfg. Conferences and other opportunities to connect with TFI.

What examples do you see of corporate-environmental progress from do-good, to leadership strategy, to economic imperative?

4 Responses to “From Do-Good, to Leadership Strategy, to Economic Imperative”

  1. From: Dr. Ramesh Srinivasan
      on February 26th, 2009

    Pamela,
    Your writings have been very informative. I am an entrepreneur in concept stage. What specific government environmental mandates, if any, are in existence or pending in future on OEM companies of high-tech products (manufacturing and distribution)? I’d appreciate if you can point me to some information sources. Thank you.

    Best Regards,
    Ramesh

  2.   on March 1st, 2009

    If your electronic products will be distributed in Europe, they may be subject to the EU’s RoHS, WEEE, and EuP directives, and the REACH regulation. Later this month, I’ll be meeting with people responsible for these requirements in the UK. You–and all of our blog readers–are welcome to forward questions, concerns, ideas to me and I’ll report back to each person. -Pam

  3. From: Dr. Ramesh Srinivasan
      on March 2nd, 2009

    Thanks for responding. For industrial products (high-tech, automotive), are there any energy related mandates? in US and Europe?

  4.   on March 4th, 2009

    The European Union’s Energy using Products (EuP) Directive is a vehicle for measuring and reducing energy consumption in all phases of manufacturing through use and afterward. It has been signed into law, and application to various product categories are being phased in over time. We expect other such legislation, in the ways that others of the world’s regulators developed substance-restriction requirements patterned after the EU’s RoHS Directive. You can expect to see a TFI blog entry on this topic later in the month. Thanks for asking.

commentsLeave a Reply

subscribeWhile you're at it, please subscribe to Friday Best of Blogs, TFI's free e-newsletter