<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An Interview with Jeff Kaylor, Sparton&#8217;s Director of Government Services</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techforecasters.com/weblog/archives/an-interview-with-jeff-kaylor-spartons-director-of-government-services/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techforecasters.com/weblog/archives/an-interview-with-jeff-kaylor-spartons-director-of-government-services/</link>
	<description>Read what our thought leaders are thinking, in our every-other-Friday TFI blog entries.   Sign up with your favorite RSS Feed service and get an automated alert whenever there&#039;s a new posting to the TFI Weblog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 10:20:37 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bryan Brady</title>
		<link>http://www.techforecasters.com/weblog/archives/an-interview-with-jeff-kaylor-spartons-director-of-government-services/comment-page-1/#comment-9873</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan Brady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 16:43:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techforecasters.com/weblog/archives/an-interview-with-jeff-kaylor-spartons-director-of-government-services/#comment-9873</guid>
		<description>Found the podcast very effective and would like to hear more in this format.  Question I have is what percentage of military programs are ITAR controlled and thereby more resistant to offshoring.  Jeff said &quot;most&quot; are ITAR.  Your Q3 Forum Report indicated over 20% of CM&#039;s used are in SE Asia and/or China already.  We are seeing a major avionics OEM getting licences for their military cards to be mfg at a CM in Malaysia.  The &quot;non traditional military&quot; CMs seem to be gaining a lot of market share in mil/aero over the past 5 years...Jabil, Celestica, Plexus etc. Expecting commercial avionics to continue to move overseas, but interested in any trend to offshoring in military.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Found the podcast very effective and would like to hear more in this format.  Question I have is what percentage of military programs are ITAR controlled and thereby more resistant to offshoring.  Jeff said &#8220;most&#8221; are ITAR.  Your Q3 Forum Report indicated over 20% of CM&#8217;s used are in SE Asia and/or China already.  We are seeing a major avionics OEM getting licences for their military cards to be mfg at a CM in Malaysia.  The &#8220;non traditional military&#8221; CMs seem to be gaining a lot of market share in mil/aero over the past 5 years&#8230;Jabil, Celestica, Plexus etc. Expecting commercial avionics to continue to move overseas, but interested in any trend to offshoring in military.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
